The message always arrives in the same shape. They love your profile, they think you would be a perfect fit, they are sending you the box, and could you do two videos.

There is no amount in it. There is no amount in it because the amount is the box, and nobody wrote that sentence down.

Three different offers wearing the same message

Before answering, work out which one you received. They look identical and they are not.

The brand that genuinely has no budget

Two people in Ghent, a product they make themselves, and a marketing budget that is whatever last month left over. This one is real, and it is common here, because a lot of Belgian brands are exactly that size.

They are not trying to get something for nothing. They are trying to get something for what they have.

The brand that decided the product is the budget

Bigger, structured, someone whose job title contains the word marketing. This one has money for photography, for media buying, for the agency that built the deck. What it has is a policy that creators are paid in product, and a policy is not a shortage.

You can tell because the message is fluent. It carries a deadline, deliverable counts, usage terms, and the tone of something sent many times.

The agency passing on what it did not keep

A client paid for a campaign, the agency took its share, and the product is what was left to offer you. The tell is a professional brief attached to unprofessional compensation, and nobody answering a direct question about the creator budget.

One question sorts them

Ask what budget the campaign holds for creators. Not whether they can pay you. What the budget is.

What the message saysWhat it usually meansWhat works as an answer
We are a small brand starting outOften trueA reduced fee plus the product
We offer product in exchange for contentA policy, not a shortageYour normal rate, politely
Great exposure to our communityThe compensation is the sentenceNo, and keep it short
The budget is set by the clientAn agency kept its shareAsk for the creator line, in writing

The answer, or the silence where an answer should be, tells you more than the original message did.

Refuse the offer, never the person

Belgium is small. The same agency staffs a dozen brands, and the person you turn down today is drawing up a list next month.

So one sentence does the work: the product covers the product, the video is invoiced separately, here is the rate. No lecture on the value of creative work. Brands that have money answer that sentence within a day.

The product is not free at tax time

Something received in exchange for a service is not a gift, whatever the delivery note says. How it gets declared depends on your status and your situation, which is a question for your accountant or for the tax administration and not for a comment section.

The practical point stands on its own: a box worth two hundred and an invoice worth two hundred are not the same object in December.

When taking it is the right call

Rarely, but not never. It is worth it when the product costs enough that you would have bought it anyway, when the name opens a door you have been knocking on, or when the footage genuinely belongs in your reel.

Exposure is not on that list and never has been.

Keep reading

Create your creator profile →


Frequently asked questions

Can I ask for the product and a fee?

Yes, and it closes more deals than any other reply. The product covers the product, the fee covers the work, and that is the split the brand was already using internally.

What if they say the product is worth more than my rate?

Ask to be paid the rate and to buy the product. Retail value is not cash, and a brand quoting you its own shelf price is quoting you its margin.

Do I owe usage rights if I was not paid?

No, and this is the line to hold. Product for organic content on your own account is one arrangement. Product for footage that will run in paid ads is not an arrangement at all.

Is it worth replying when there is clearly no budget?

Reply briefly. A polite rate answer costs a minute and gets forwarded to the person who does have a budget more often than you would expect.