A micro influencer and a UGC creator can be the same person. You are still buying two different things, and in Germany who has to disclose differs too.

The difference in one line

The micro influencer publishes on their profile and their followers see your product. The UGC creator delivers a file that you run yourself. One is distribution, the other is production.

What changes in the price

Reach is priced by followers and niche, UGC by videos, variants and rights. For the same budget you get one publication with limited reach, or several videos you run with your own ad budget for as long as they deliver.

What changes in the rights

A publication on someone else's profile does not give you the right to run the same video as an ad. If you want both, both points belong in the same agreement, with channels, duration and territory.

Who discloses

On the influencer post, the influencer labels it. On your ad, you label it as the advertiser. Taking an influencer post without disclosure into your ads does not move the problem, it doubles it.

What changes in the result

The influencer brings a spike: a few days of visibility, then decay. UGC brings an asset: material that works for months in campaigns and on product pages. Event versus infrastructure.

How to buy both in one job

If the same person convinces you as a face and as reach: one publication on their profile plus ad rights on the footage, in a single agreement. Cheaper than two separate purchases, and you get the spike and the asset at once.

Keep reading

Find UGC creators in Germany →


Frequently asked questions

Are they the same?

No, reach versus a file with rights.

Can I run the post as an ad?

Only with purchased rights.

Who discloses?

The influencer on their profile, you on your ads.

Which lasts longer?

UGC, because it stays usable for months.