A brand looking at your profile opens your best video, watches the beginning, and then scrolls to see how many others exist.

The second half of that sentence is the whole problem, and almost nobody builds for it. New creators spend their effort making one video as good as possible, when the thing being assessed is the count and the consistency underneath it.

What a first portfolio has to prove

Not that you are talented. That you are safe to book.

Nobody is buying taste, they are buying repeatability

A brand commissioning UGC has a date, a product and a person they have to show something to. What frightens them is not receiving a mediocre video. It is receiving nothing, or receiving something they cannot use, with no time left to fix it.

So the question they are silently asking your profile is whether you can do the same thing again next month. One outstanding video does not answer that question. It can even raise it, because a single brilliant piece with nothing around it reads as luck or as somebody else's edit.

Four ordinary videos beat one brilliant one

Four pieces that are clearly by the same person, clearly shot in a real home, clearly finished, and clearly different from each other, answer every question a first time buyer has.

They show that you can frame a product, that your audio works, that you finish things, and that you have more than one idea. None of those require the videos to be remarkable. They require them to exist, together, and to look like a set rather than a collection of attempts.

What is in your portfolioWhat the brand concludesDoes it get you booked
One very good videoPossibly a fluke, or not yoursRarely, it invites more questions
Four consistent ordinary onesYou can do this on demandYes, this is the whole trick
Ten videos in ten different stylesYou have not decided what you doNo, it reads as unfocused
Videos with no product in shotYou make content, not UGCNo, it is a different job
A video for a brand they compete withYou understand their categoryOften, and faster than anything else

The last row is the one worth building around, and in Portugal it works better than it does almost anywhere else.

Spec work here is prospecting, not practice

The standard advice is to make unpaid videos for large international brands as an exercise. That advice comes from bigger markets and it wastes the main advantage of this one.

In a market this size, the brand you make an uncommissioned video for will quite probably see it. Somebody tags them, somebody sends it internally, or you send it yourself, and the distance between your kitchen and their marketing decision is one message.

Choose the brand the way you would choose a prospect

That changes the selection completely. Do not pick the biggest brand you admire. Pick a company that is the right size to hire you, is already posting content, is visibly not very good at it, and sells something you can genuinely buy and use.

Then make the video you would have made if they had briefed you, not the one that shows off. Keep it in their format, on their kind of product, addressing the objection their comments section keeps raising. Send it with two sentences and no attachment beyond the link.

The response rate on that is unlike anything else a new creator can do, and the video sits in your portfolio either way. That is why it is the right first move rather than a clever one.

What to shoot this week

Buy three products you actually use, in three different categories that could plausibly hire UGC: something in a kitchen, something in a bathroom, something you carry.

Film each one twice, once as a straight demonstration and once as a problem and solution. That is six pieces from an afternoon, and the two versions of each teach you which one you are better at, which is genuinely useful information about what to sell.

Then add the spec piece for a real local company, and stop. Seven videos is more than enough to start, and the eighth one is worth much less than the first message you send to a brand.

Keep reading

Publish your creator profile →


Frequently asked questions

Should I say these were not paid work?

Do not present them as client work, and do not apologise for them either. Nobody expects a first portfolio to be commissioned, and a piece clearly made for a brand you like is a normal thing for a creator to do.

Can I use products I was gifted?

Yes, and if you post them publicly the usual disclosure rules apply. In a private portfolio sent to a brand, it is simply a video you made.

How different should the four videos be?

Different in scenario, similar in look and finish. The consistency is the reassurance. The variety is the proof you are not a one idea creator.

Is it worth paying for equipment first?

No. Every one of these can be shot on a phone by a window, and a first portfolio that is well lit on a phone beats a badly lit one shot on something expensive.