Nonprofits have the smallest budgets and the most sceptical audience, because a donor is being asked to give money away and wants to know where it goes. That combination makes creator video unusually well suited to the sector.

The donor question is where does it go

Not what the cause is, they already care about that. What they want is evidence that the money does something specific. A video showing one concrete outcome beats any statistic about scale, and it is exactly what a creator can film cheaply.

Small budgets are not a disadvantage here

A polished production can actively harm a charity by making a donor wonder what it cost. Modest, honest video is the correct register for the sector, which means the cheapest option is also the most effective one.

Beneficiaries must participate, not appear

Anyone shown receiving help has to consent, understand how the footage will be used and be represented with dignity. Getting this wrong is a reputational failure that outlives any campaign, and it is a genuine ethical obligation before it is a legal one.

Fundraising has rules

Charitable status carries requirements on how funds may be solicited, how donations are receipted and what may be claimed. A creator improvising a fundraising appeal can create a compliance problem for an organisation that cannot afford one.

Volunteers are the second campaign

Most organisations need people as much as money, and a video showing what volunteering actually involves, how much time it takes and what a shift is like recruits better than any appeal. It is also easier to film.

Keep reading

Find creators for your campaign →

Frequently asked questions

What does a donor want to see?

Where the money specifically goes.

Is a small budget a problem?

No, modest video is the right register.

How should beneficiaries appear?

With consent and with dignity.

What is the second campaign?

Volunteer recruitment.