The question is not which is better. It is which problem you are solving, because a production house and a UGC creator make two different objects that only resemble each other on screen.

When a production house earns its price

  • A brand piece meant to last for years.
  • Complex shoots: several locations, crew, permits, safety.
  • Strict image constraints, common in luxury, automotive and large consumer goods.
  • A television campaign, where technical quality is an entry requirement.

When it destroys exactly the effect you paid for

When you buy a video meant to look like a person's recommendation and produce it like a commercial. Perfect lighting, grading and a trained voice: the audience recognises advertising in two seconds and keeps scrolling. You paid more to get less, which is the worst possible outcome.

The order of magnitude in Spain

A production day with a small crew costs roughly the same as a batch of six to eight UGC videos including rights. The difference is not twenty percent, it is a multiple, and in performance campaigns UGC is usually ahead.

The combination that works

One brand piece a year for the website, trade fairs and the sales team. Alongside it, a continuous flow of UGC for ads and product pages. Two budgets, two jobs. Mixing them ends with the brand piece running as an ad and UGC being asked to represent the brand.

The question that comes first

"Does this video need to last three years or three weeks?" If the answer is three weeks, traditional production is out, whatever the budget.

Keep reading

Find UGC creators in Spain →

Frequently asked questions

Is a production house always more expensive?

Yes, usually by a multiple.

Does it perform better in ads?

Usually not, it reads as advertising.

When is a production needed?

Complex shoots, television, strict image constraints.

Can you use both?

Yes, with separate budgets and jobs.