A stock clip costs a few euros, a creator video costs a multiple. The comparison looks settled, and it is, but in the opposite direction from the one the price suggests.

Why stock is expensive precisely when it is cheap

A generic clip answers no question about your product. It does not show real size, it does not show your packaging, it does not say what happens when you use it. So it does not convert, and content that does not convert is expensive at any price, because it consumes ad budget without producing sales.

What Italian audiences recognise instantly

The same three or four clips circulate across dozens of brands. A kitchen that is too tidy, a person laughing at a salad, a hand swiping a tablet: the audience has seen them, and when they recognise them they stop believing the rest of the ad as well.

Where stock still works

ChannelWhat it gets you
As an insertFor two seconds of context inside a creator video.
For impossible shotsDrones, remote locations, aerials.
For corporate contentWhere nobody expects authenticity.
For very fast message testsBefore producing.

The honest comparison

Stock buys time, UGC buys credibility. If your problem is publishing something presentable today, stock is fine. If your problem is selling, no generic clip can do the job of a person showing your product in their own home.

The Italian case

In Italy international stock has one extra flaw: the homes, kitchens and supermarkets do not look Italian. The audience could not say why, but they sense the scene is not theirs, and that alone cools trust.

Keep reading

Find UGC creators in Italy →


Frequently asked questions

Does stock convert?

Rarely, because it does not show your product.

When should I use it?

As an insert, for impossible shots, for fast tests.

Why is it recognisable?

Because the same clips run across many brands.

Is it really cheaper?

Per clip yes, per result almost never.