Fitness is the category where the professional model actively hurts the campaign. A body the viewer cannot imagine having proves nothing about the product, and Mexican audiences have become very good at spotting the difference.

The ordinary body outperforms the athlete

Somebody visibly in the middle of their process, in a real gym or a small apartment, is far more persuasive than a sponsored athlete. The viewer is not aspiring to the physique, they are checking whether the product works for a person at their stage.

Show the product in use, not the result

Film the leggings during a squat, the shaker being cleaned, the mat unrolling and staying flat. Fitness buyers have been disappointed before and they are watching for practical failure points rather than for inspiration.

Health and body claims get ads rejected

Weight loss promises, before and after transformations and anything that implies a medical outcome are restricted on the major ad platforms and scrutinised by regulators. Describe the experience of using the product, not the outcome it supposedly produces.

Home training is the majority context

Gym membership is not universal and a great deal of training happens in living rooms and small spaces. A video filmed in an empty premium gym speaks to a minority of the market, and one filmed at home speaks to most of it.

Supplements need extra care

Nutritional supplements carry labelling obligations and a creator improvising a health benefit creates a real liability. Give the creator the approved wording and let them say it in their own voice rather than inventing one.

Keep reading

Find creators for your campaign →

Frequently asked questions

Should we cast an athlete?

Usually not, ordinary bodies convince more.

What should the video show?

The product in use, not the result.

What gets an ad rejected?

Weight loss and medical claims.

Where should it be filmed?

Mostly at home, where people train.