The two things get confused because the same person often does both. The difference is not the video, it is what you are buying: content you own, or access to somebody else's audience.

What you actually purchase

With UGC you buy a file and a licence to use it. Where it runs, for how long and on which channels is your decision. With influencer marketing you buy a post on their account, reaching their followers, and the content lives in their feed under their control.

The price is built differently

UGC is priced on production plus usage rights. Influencer work is priced on audience size and engagement. That is why a creator with two hundred followers can charge a professional rate for UGC and nothing at all for a sponsored post, and why comparing the two quotes side by side makes no sense.

What Canada adds

A national campaign needs both languages. Buying UGC lets you commission the French version deliberately. Buying influencer reach means finding a francophone influencer with a Quebec audience, which is a separate search, a separate negotiation and a separate budget line.

When each one is right

If the goal is ad creative you will run and test, buy UGC. If the goal is reaching a specific community that trusts a specific person, buy influence. Most brands need the first far more often than they need the second, and they buy the second because it is more familiar.

The hybrid, priced honestly

You can buy both from the same person: the video for your channels, plus a post on theirs. Price them as two separate lines rather than assuming one includes the other. That assumption is the single most common source of disputes in this category.

Keep reading

Find creators for your campaign →

Frequently asked questions

What do I own with UGC?

The file and a defined usage licence.

Why do the prices differ so much?

One prices production, the other prices audience.

What does bilingual change?

UGC lets you commission the French version deliberately.

Can I buy both from one person?

Yes, as two separate lines.