Comparison is the format buyers search for most and the one brands find most uncomfortable. Nobody wants to pay for a video mentioning the competition, but the customer will compare anyway. The only question is whether they compare using your information or somebody else's.

Compare without naming

The safe approach is comparing against a category rather than a brand: the plastic model against the metal one, the generic against the one with service support, the small version against the large one. It reads the same, does not expose the brand and avoids a legal letter.

When naming is allowed

Only if the brand asks in writing and can support every claim with verifiable data. Comparative advertising has rules and the risk sits with whoever paid, not the creator. If you are asked, request the backing in writing before filming.

Compare the product with itself

This is the easiest angle to sell: the previous version against the new one, the basic model against the full one, the product fresh out of the box against the same one after six months. Nobody is exposed and the buyer gets exactly the information they were after.

Honesty drives the format

A comparison where the client's product wins on everything convinces nobody. Acknowledging one small disadvantage, irrelevant to the main use, makes everything else believable. It feels counterintuitive to the brand and it is what makes the format work.

Shooting format

Fixed shot, both objects in frame, same framing and same light for each. Changing the shot between one and the other breaks the comparison. And say the criteria out loud: what is measured, how, and over how long.

Keep reading

Publish your creator profile →

Frequently asked questions

Can I name the competition?

Only if the brand asks in writing and backs it.

Which comparison is safe?

Against a category or against your own product.

Must it win on everything?

No, admitting a disadvantage makes it credible.

How is it filmed?

Fixed shot, same light and same framing.