Problem and solution is the most reliable structure in direct response advertising, and it fails in exactly one way: when the problem is invented to fit the product.
The problem has to be one people actually have
If the viewer does not recognise the problem in the first seconds, everything after it is answering a question they never asked. The test is whether somebody would describe the problem in those words without being prompted.
Show the problem, do not narrate it
The tangled cable, the sauce on the shirt, the drawer that will not close. Two seconds of visual is worth more than a sentence explaining it, and it works with the sound off, which is how most of the audience will see it.
Do not exaggerate the problem
The format has a long history of absurd struggle: somebody unable to open a jar, spilling everything, defeated by a basic task. Audiences read that as an advertisement immediately. The credible version shows a mild, real irritation rather than a catastrophe.
The solution must be shown, not claimed
Move directly from problem to the product doing the thing. Skipping the demonstration and jumping to a happy result is where this structure loses the viewer, because the middle is the only part that constitutes evidence.
It suits paid advertising better than organic
The structure is efficient, direct and slightly formulaic, which is exactly right for an interruption and slightly wrong for a feed somebody chose to scroll. Use it where the viewer did not ask to be there.
Keep reading
- The Tutorial Format in UGC
- The Unboxing Format in UGC
- The Comparison Format in UGC
- Self Employed or Incorporated as a Creator in Quebec
- The complete UGC guide for Canada
Find creators for your campaign →
Frequently asked questions
What makes the format fail?
An invented problem.
Should the problem be narrated?
No, show it visually.
Is exaggeration effective?
No, it reads as an advertisement.
Where does it work best?
In paid advertising rather than organic.
